Problems with 2001 Toyota Sequoia TIRES

Three (3) cooper tire failures, discoverer h/t, 265/70r16, dot number utc2c5t2305. 9 oct 2013, took vehicle in for regular maintenance. received courtesy inspection that included tire tread/condition check. checks were good with outer/inner tread depth of 8/5, 7/5, 8/8, 8/8. tires rotated and front end alignment accomplished due to uneven wear on front tires. on nov 4, 2013, 400 miles of interstate driving after 9 oct 2013 tire rotation/front end alignment, 7/5 tire tread separated on interstate damaging left rear wheel well, left rear quarter panel and rear bumper ($2500 damage). 11 april 2014, approx 2500 miles after 9 oct 2013 tire rotation/front end alignment, 8/5 tire tread separated on interstate damaging right rear wheel well, right rear quarter panel, right rear door and rear bumper (approx $2000 damage). purchase 2 new tires for front, rotated both 8/8 tires to rear and had them inspected at tire dealer who said that there was no need to replace and that there was several thousand miles left of use. 10 may 2014, approx 3500 miles after 9 oct 2013 tire rotation/front end alignment, left rear 8/8 tire tread separated on interstate damaging left rear wheel well, fuel line, left rear quarter panel, left rear door, left running board, and rear bumper. *tr

Left rear tire tread separation on 2001 toyota sequoia on interstate 10 at 70 mph. it was original tire installed by the manufacturer. car mileage was 34,400. dunlop grand trek at21, p265/70/r16. damages to car $1590.00. tire was the cause of accident, and therefore not covered by insurance. demand reimbursement of deductible and free replacement of full set of tires.*ak

Defective dunlop tire inside coming apart. tires have to be replaced. *bf both tires seemed to have had large indents within the tread on the inside shoulder. *sc

Failure reguarding to tires....in particular to toyo tires / open country, 265/r70/16. he problem is a safety issue, the tires are cracking in the tread grooves. and not just one tire all four tires, to top that all off these are the second set....the first one's were already replaced for the same problem. the originals had only less than 10,000miles when i, had noticed the cracking, toyo tires replaced all four because of the defect( all four tire were cracked). the replacement set also cracked the same way, but i, had just noticed the defect....almost 45,000miles later (again all four tires are cracked the same way. i have been told different and changing stories. what i want to know are these tires safe....i'm worried about my families safety, are these tires going to explode as they drive on the highway(we have a large suv). this defect should be checked out. i can send a copy of the bills and the authorization numbers for the replacements (second set / all four). also i am willing to send the tires. how can this be 8 tires all crack the same way, is this a big defect? or does the, number of deaths, box need a number in it first?*ak

Purchased 2001 sequioa approx. 7/2001 sloane toyota- devon, pa. approx. 13k car began to shudders when braking. dealer advised needed new brakes reason "due to the size of vehicle, is not uncommon for brakes need replacing every 8-13k miles" was later advised rotors need grinding. service guy said i must have "hit the brakes real hard." no way. i baby this car. dealer then advised rotor work was under warranty.now life of rotors compromised. i was not advised about tsb re: rotors/ brake calipers. 7/28/2004 went for oil change. was advised i needed brake pads =$250, vehicle now has 19k. again i'm reminded " big cars need to have brakes replaced every 15 -20k if not sooner." is apparent service people have been "coached" to follow script re: brake/ rotor probs w/vehicle. found many posts on internet re: this prob. dealers all over u.s. feeding consumers same line. is insanity to have consumers install brakes every 15k-20k miles (normal driving) and rotors gound every 13k. also- tires that came w/car are bald/need replacing. dunlops (sorry, don't have the model handy and i want post to go). very low mileage on car, it should be "mint." consumers apparently expected to replace brakes/ tires and have the rotors ground every 13k - 19k miles for life of vehicle. considering cost of vehicle dealers should own up to the vehicle faults, advise consumers of current probs and "replace" (not grind) badly engineered parts, tires, etc. and eat those service costs. if it weren't for the fact that i am leaving for vacation in a few days, i would go right back with internet posts in handand press them for a good explanation and a refund for the brake work, get new rotors and calipers installed and be compensated for the lousy tires the vehicle came with. i researched suv's for over 1.5 years before deciding on the sequoia, i wish it would live up to consumer expectations. kirby mcghee paoli, pa. 19301. *ak

Purchased a toyota sequoia 7/01. been in and out of service ever since. we are currently on our 3rd set of brakes, 3rd trip computer, and 3rd set of tires, 2nd battery, 2nd amplifier. car only has 33,000 miles many other problems including some electrical. currently waiting for word from dealership on problems with transmission and fuel system. everything up to this point (except tires #3) has been covered by warranty. dealership got a case # with toyota so these problems will be covered if they persist. feel like we are on the path to a lemon. don't know how else to proceed. sent toyota a letter detailing problems, asking to possibly help us get into another vehicle. we are at the point where it is a new concern everyday with this car. help!!!!!!*ak

The tires had no traction, when driving in the snow, consumer stated the tires were incompatible with the vehicle.*jb

Consumer states while driving a 2001 toyota sequoia at 60 mph, the right rear tire had a blowout. original equipemnt, tire size p265/70r16, and the dot# db72c481001. dealer and the manufacturer were notified. *jb consumer stated that the tire had never been soft or flat, the whole side wall blew out. *yh