The i-miev was being operated in a shopping center parking lot at an unknown speed when it hit a parked car a and pushed a into parked car b. the driver's airbag in the i-miev deployed. the driver did not appear to be affected by the airbag deployment, according to witnesses, and was cogent and conversational. the i-miev was towed away due to front fender damage impeding the tire. the driver was prescribed the blood thinner warfin at the time of the accident. the driver continued with the daily routine and was reported ...
Tl* the contact owns a 2012 mitsubishi i-miev. the contact stated that while driving at various speeds, the brakes failed to engage and the contact crashed into another vehicle. the driver sustained injuries to the spine which required medical attention. a police report was filed. the vehicle was destroyed. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the contact received a notification for nhtsa campaign number: 14v522000 (brakes) and believed that the failure was directly related to the recall. the approximate failure mileage was 22,000.
2012 mitsubishi i-miev. complaint related to second recall of i-miev. *mw the consumer stated at 12,000 miles, the front brake pads disintegrated for no reason. the technician stated the vacuum pump related and the brake pads disintegrating were related. the consumer stated mitsubishi would not pay to have the vehicle shipped honolulu from hawaii island. mitsubishi stated the brakes were not a warranty item. *jb
Overall the worst problem with Mitsubishi i-MiEV relates to SERVICE BRAKES problems. Browse the categories below to learn about the specific i-MiEV years that are prone to issues with these components.