Below you may see the FRAME AND MEMBERS components and the number of complaints they received.
Rear end failed due to rust out parts of pickup. *tr
Cab separated from chassis. cab is attached to chassis at 4 flanges welded to frame. 2 each 10 mm bolts connect cab to each flange. a 71 mm hole ex...
2001 toyota tundra brake failure resulting in single vehicle accident running off the road into ditch and had to be towed. inspection photos availabl...
My tundra was recalled for a frame inspection it was coated with a anti corrosion the dealer sprayed over the the brake lines that that were also corroded they were sprayed with the same undercoating when they should have been replaced i was on my way home this afternoon and my brake line burst from the corrosion causing a accident because of brake failure
Tl* the contact owns a 2004 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was undergoing routine maintenance, the contact was able to see that the frame was rusted. there were no warning indicators illuminated. the dealer and manufacturer were made aware of the failure. the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. the failure mileage was 224,300.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the brake indicator illuminated. the contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the rear cross member was severely corroded, which spread to the brake line proportional valve. the contact found that the vin was included in nhtsa campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). the vehicle was taken to an unknown dealer and the contact was informed that the state of south carolina was not included in the recall; therefore, they were unable to perform the recall repair. the manufacturer was contacted and provided case number: 1904080954. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 187,000. parts distribution disconnect.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was undergoing routine maintenance at toyota of bedford (18151 rockside rd, bedford, oh 44146), the technician informed the contact that the frame was corroded. there were no warning indicators illuminated. the vehicle had not been repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the failure mileage was 190,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2004 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the frame was rusted, rotted, and the bottom portion developed bubbles. the vehicle was taken to lakewood toyota (1118 ocean avenue rt88, lakewood, nj 08710, 732-364-9000), but was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and no assistance was provided. the failure mileage was 190,000. .*bf *tr
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the frame was rusted and had several holes. there were no warning indicators illuminated. the vehicle was taken to boch toyota norwood (277 boston providence tpke, norwood, ma 02062, (888) 321-6631) where it was diagnosed that the frame needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was contacted and did not assist. the failure mileage was 88,321.
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 toyota tundra. the contact took the vehicle to an unknown dealer concerning an engine light diagnostic test and was informed that the frame was corroded. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the failure mileage was 121,000. *tt there was a recall for this issue, they said it expired. consumer stated a rusting frame because of low grade steel, is a safety issue. *jb
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was being serviced at an independent mechanic, the contact was informed that the front driver and passenger side frame was corroded and needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the vehicle was not taken to a dealer. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 150,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2004 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the vehicle was taken for a state inspection where it wa discovered that the entire subframe was rusted through. the contact was informed that the vehicle was unsafe to operate. hoselton toyota (50 marsh rd, east rochester, ny 14445, (585) 381-8530) was contacted and informed of the failure. the contact was informed that there was an extended warranty for an anti-corrosion spray of the subframe that expired in 2015. the manufacturer was contacted and was informed that since the warranty period was exceeded, there would be no further assistance. the approximate failure mileage was 79,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 toyota tundra. the contact stated that there was excessive corrosion of the rear cross member. the contact was concerned that the failure could cause the spare tire to detach, which was stowed underneath the truck bed. the vehicle was taken to aubrey alexander toyota (1324 n susquehanna trail, selinsgrove, pa 17870) where it was determined that the frame needed to be replaced. the manufacturer was also made aware of the failure. the vin was not included in nhtsa campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 131,000.