Problems with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro TIRES

I took my car in for service, ie, oil change, tire rotation, air filter replacement. i was informed that my tires, even though they had plenty of tread life left on them, 6/32 front, 5/32 rear, that they were dry rotted and separated between the treads. also was informed that this could be very dangerous, the tires may come apart while driving. i was informed by the technician that this was a defect in the tires. in addition, the tires were put on a 2010 camaro and the manufactures date on all 4 tires are from 2008. i know eventually i would have to buy new tires, but if the tires weren't in the condition they are in i more than likely could get another 30,000 miles out of them. most importantly is the safety hazard of the tires. looking through the reports on this particular tire, i saw similar complaints. *tr

I have a 2010 camaro 2lt with 255-20front and 275-20rear, at around 15k kilometers i noticed a slight noise of front tires and effect on the steering, i found a bit later that the pirelli p zero's were starting to cup, i brought the vehicle into my gm dealer and they replaced them through warranty, i had a full alignment done, nothing was out of line or balance. i am on my 2nd set of fronts and they are also toast at the same mileage interval. i am not sure if the tires are the problem or if the vehicles steering/suspension system is to light to handle the large tires? when i look at the steering system i am highly suspicious that this is the case. gm would of course deny this and i cannot prove this until i change over to another set of tires. it will be interesting to find out if the steering being too light would be the problem. *tr

New 2010 chevrolet camaro....four new pirelli tires came with new car...had to replace tires due to separation of tread...car only had 16,000 mi a year and a half a little early to replace tires...too dangerous to drive with tires in this condition...contacted pirelli tires to no avail...bought a new car so as not to have costly repairs or dangerous equipment..tires should be recalled.. *tr

I purchased a 2010 ss camaro in northeast ohio. after purchase i found out that the cars come with "summer only" tires. the tires do not say anything about being "summer only" so i tried to drive the car in our winter season. the car is impossible to drive in as little as an inch of snow. i purchased winter tires for this season for over $1000.00. pirelle informed me that the tires an not to be used in temps under 41 degrees, the week of thanksgiving (2010) temps in florida were under 35 degrees. these tires can not be used in more than 50% of america! why should a customer of a new car be expected to purchase tires? then are unsafe and unusable in most parts of the country. *tr

Tl*the contact owns a 2010 chevrolet camaro ss equipped with pirelli pzero tires, size p245/45/20. the contact stated that the tires sold on the vehicle were "summer tires". while driving 45 mph and passing another vehicle, the tires lost traction and moved sideways. the contact called the tire manufacturer who stated that when the temperature was below 45 degrees, the tires should not be used. the warranty was void and should be switched for "winter tires". the tires were not replaced. the current mileage was approximately 8,000. the failure mileage was approximately 7,000.

This complaint is to make the nhtsa aware of a safety hazard that exists with certain 2011 chevrolet camaros. i own a 1lt equipped with the rs package. this package includes 20" rims. unfortunately, shortly after taking possession of the vehicle, i learned that gm equips rs camaros with pirelli p-zero tires. these tires are rated as "summer only" tires and will pose an extreme safety hazard to those attempting to operate the vehicle in snow, or temperatures below 45 degrees f--essentially making the vehicle undrivable in winter weather. gm, nor the dealership, warned the driver that these tires can only be used in the summer. unaware drivers may become stuck or lose control and crash, due to the tire's loss of traction and hardening of rubber in cold/winter conditions. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2011 chevrolet camaro (na) equipped with pirelli p0 tires, size 245/45/r20 front, 275/40/r20 in the rear. the contact stated that the vehicle was equipped with tires that were only good in the summer weather or in states that had continuously nice weather all year long. he stated that the tires had no traction and on the tire it was notated "summer only". the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer. the dealer stated that they had no control over the tires that were installed by the factory and referred him to the manufacturer. the manufacturer offered no assistance. the tires were not replaced. the vin was not available. the failure mileage was approximately 100 and the current mileage was approximately 150.

2010 chevrolet camaro. consumer states problems with tires *tgw the consumer stated while driving, he felt the vehicle start to run different and there was a smell of rubber. earlier during the drive, he received an alert that the driver side front tire pressure was low, so he stopped and added air. there was no indication that the rear driver side tire was low on pressure. the consumer pulled over and discovered the rear driver side tire was completely flat and destroyed beyond repair. the consumer then called onstar and was given the tire size of his tires, only to discover the tires on the vehicle were smaller than the tires on the front. the consumer is requesting reimbursement due to an error that was made at the factory and the money that was spent to replace the tire. *jb

Traveling westbound on interstate 80 from reno to san francisco 55-65 mph, without warning my 2010 camaro had 100 % loss of all power and operating functions; out of control down the mountain during heavy traffic i was able to stop the vehicle by jamming into the guardrail, trapping myself in car. nothing worked...no onstar...i called my daughter in reno and told her to send help..i was in shock. i had no clue what happened or why..but after the traffic slowed down i exited the vehicle, still no help or response. car started with limited abilities 25 mph; was advised that it was okay to drive back to reno and "bring it on in" at my convenience. nothing was done. the car ready before the shuttle got back to the shop. the service men shrugged it off and told me to watch for the warning signs; i can't have any serious problems because they haven't had any electrical problems with these cars across the board??!i had no warning signs..i am lucky that i was not killed and did not kill anybody with my imaginary car problems. 2nd incident all systems went crazy, extreme heat coming from dash, no heat turned on, false readings, all warning lights and gauges went off, power locks don't work, no more auto start i requested service with no response for 5 days. i left a very expressive message for fleet manager and service dept finally responded. bad service..rude. i paid over 300 for car rental gm picked up 1 day they concluded again nothing wrong with car. malfunction was caused by snow and cold weather (not acceptable)because it wasn't driven in snow. 3rd time driving with kids on freeway in reno...guess what no power!! was advised once again that i could drive it on in the next business day. well i learned the gm secret. let her sit and she'll reset. i will not be able to live with the consequences of a death caused by a $50000 time bomb. dream car not worth a life or the fear of what might happen everytime you start it. *tr