Problems with 2006 Toyota Tundra STRUCTURE

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was parked, the contact noticed oil leaking from the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who diagnosed that there were holes in the frame. the rear end housing was replaced, but the holes in the frame were not repaired. the contact was informed to take the vehicle to a dealer for inspection. the vehicle was taken to buckhannon toyota (63 brushy fork rd, buckhannon, wv 26201), but did not inspect the vehicle since nothing could be done. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that the vehicle had no recalls and that the issue was due to the contact not taking the vehicle for undercoating, although there was no undercoating recall on the vehicle. the approximate failure mileage was 120,000. updated 09/07/17*lj *cn

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. after the contact closed the driver's door, an excessive amount of rust fell from underneath the vehicle. the contact stated that there was excessive corrosion to the subframe of the vehicle. the vehicle was not taken to be inspected because the contact was concerned that it may not pass. a dealer was not contacted. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the contact was informed that there was a warranty extension for the subframe corrosion; however, the warranty period had expired. the approximate failure mileage was 170,000.

I purchased truck used june 2016..somebody informed me later that there had been a rust issue with the frames on these models. upon visual inspection it looks like at some point somebody tried to cover up with under spray. that has not held because a good portion of frame and cross member has rusted away. i called toyota and they gave me two case numbers and said it was out of warranty and recall expired. i asked dealership to inspect for rust in january of 2017 and they said it was toyota issue and to wait. i think it could be potential safety issue if trying to pull trailer and possible any other time..safety issues should not have expiration in my opinion. not good feedback since january.

2006 toyota tundra. consumer writes in regards to frame rusting on vehicle. *ld *js

2006 toyota tundra truck bed started rusting several years ago. there was a recall for the rusted frame but not the bed. surrounding metal area surrounding all screws that hold bed onto frame completely rusted. golf ball size holes in bed as well. rusting rapidly. when i called toyota corporate, the response was, "if we fix it for you, we have to fix it for everyone." i do not have the monies to repair a defective product. this is not right. spent too much on this vehicle. inside bed looks like the current pictures of thetitanic. i am at a complete loss. should not have to pay for this defect. *tr

I recently had to have some body work done on my 2006 toyota tundra. the body shop owner said that he saw the frame was extremely rusty and in his opinion was a safety hazard. he said he remembered that toyota had a recall for rusty frames previously but he did not remember what years and models were included in the recall. he suggested i contact toyota. i did contact toyota and was told that my vehicle was included in the recall but that the recall had expired in july of 2015. i purchased this vehicle new in 2006 and have been the only owner of the truck. i was never notified of this recall and had no idea there was a problem with their trucks. after speaking on the phone with a toyota repnad being told they would not do anything for my truck i sent an email to their headquarters and they responded that they stood behind their original response. i do not understand how a safety recall can expire. the safety problem will always be there until fixed. i feel i am now driving a dangerous vehicle and feel that toyota should stand by whatever the original remedy was. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. when the vehicle was taken to the dealer for routine service, the technician stated that the subframe was corroded and needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 210,000.

In 2014 received a recall notice on my frame i took it to a local dealership classic toyota of mentor ohio they said frame needed replaced scheduled them to do all work they said it may be a few months before the frames in so i said okay and waited a few months hadn't heard from them call them ask them if it came in they said no i asked them if there was anyway to check on it they said no but the wait is normal and they would call me when it gets there so i waited a couple more months called them again and the same thing so i waited a couple more months call them again and again same thing so in february 2016 i called them up got the same response by this time it had been over a year so i called toyota headquarters in california and ask them what was going on they called the dealership and it turned out the dealership never ordered the frame i have been going back and forth between the two and they are both refusing to do anything even though now there is a large rust hole through the frame and components are rusting out

It started with my gas tank falling off the frame. my wife was driving the truck at the time the gas tank band broke that holds the gas tank to the frame. i then found a hole in the frame on the driver's side, just in front of the sway bar mount, large enough to place my hand in to the center of my palm. obviously, this vehicle is not safe to drive. i then contacted my dealer that i purchased the vehicle from, down east toyota of brewer, me. the lady i spoke with (lynn), from down east toyota of brewer, maine, was condescending and arrogant eluding that the problem was somehow my fault. i learned from her that apparently there was a recall for rusted frames. i do not recall getting this recall information. but let that go, my dealer that i bought the truck from (down east toyota in brewer, maine) has told me that i should feel fortunate that i got 10 years from the truck. since this is as long as they are supposed to last anyways. my dealer (down east toyota of brewer, maine) told me my option was that they have a person that buys used vehicles and i could make an appointment with them to see what the junk buyer would give me for my truck. or, i could pay to have the frame replaced. given the severity of this kind of issue, and the safety issues raised with a damaged frame, i would have expected to receive notification through registered mail of the issue. or at least, a follow up letter to insure the first notice was received. as i said, i do not remember getting such notification. i have written to toyota and have heard nothing back as of yet.

Just bought my tundra low miles nice truck i just found a hole 1 inch by 6 inch on my frame by the engine mount on the right front

The frame is rusting. i called and was told the notice i received was for air bag issues according to the dealer. so i called corporate and was told the notice on my rust issues expired july of 2015. what i don't understand is why i received the notice for the airbag but not the rust issue? and now that i know about it and want to get it resolved they wont do anything? i have had to replace a ball joint because of this issue and i am surprised there is not a recall. the frames will eventually rust apart til the snap. are we waiting for a certain amount of people to die before holding them accountable? this isn't some small issue, this can be life threatening. i maintain my vehicle very well. it gets all the routine things done and only a mechanic touches it, it is never worked on at home in the garage. i love my toyota and i am very shocked they haven't gone further to correct their wrong. they made the mistake and didn't protect it not me. i do everything i am supposed to do to keep my vehicle in tip top condition so i am not left stranded on the side of the road.

Stabilizer links rotted off, fixed. front end failing, falling apart at 78,000 miles. also truck frame rusting badly, received recall 3rd notice a year after they expired it. i never received 1st 2 notices, they don't come not registered mail. we had mail issues with usps! the regular mailman was out for 2 years with cancer so we had substitute mailmen, we didn't always get our mail, get other peoples mail etc.. we would of called about the recall if we knew! i called toyota corporate, they didn't care, said i had 3 notices, i only received 1 notice and it was a year after it expired! i am 2nd owner. the front end in the truck is falling apart, horrible vibrating/bumping and banging when driving down the road, truck now has 92k, i googled and it came back lower ball joint problem recall, 2006 tundra. if it was serviced by previous owner and ball joint failed again wouldn't be recalled covered again? how do you find out if it was fixed the 1st time? i don't want to put more money into it if it is covered under a recall! i bought it with 58k, it was always garaged and only did vacation trips/highway miles, previous owner worked from home. i go 7 miles/day. and highway vacation trips. previous owner was elderly and has passed away. any service records i don't have, but he maintained it well! recalls should come registered mail! we also have a seat belt problem, they don't always work. they jam, don't recoil, get stuck.

My 2006 toyota tundra double cab has significant rust, which has resulted in a crack along the frame rail approximately 6 inches long near the passenger side front wheel. the frame has numerous other holes opening up and significant flakes of steel falling of the frame in this same area. i have meticulously cared for this vehicle and have been sure to keep the car and frame clean, particularly during the harsh winter months. nonetheless the frame has rusted to the point where the sway bar mount on the passenger side has almost rusted through. while toyota initiated a "limited service campaign" this is not a full recall. i learned of this significant damage 26 days after the conclusion of the campaign on july 31, 2015. as this is not a recall, customers such as myself have no recourse. i contacted toyota and was rudely informed that there are no exceptions and that my vehicle cannot be covered under the campaign as it has expired. this leaves me with significant damage as a result of toyota's engineering error. not only does this significantly reduce the value of my vehicle, but clearly poses a safety hazard as critical components of the front suspension are weakened. furthermore, an accident could result in serious damage and injury as a result of the weakened structure. the fact that this has not been not been classified as a recall is appalling. toyota is unwilling to stand behind their vehicles and has left me to fend for myself for their error. i strongly urge the nhtsa to reconsider their closed case on this frame issue and demand a recall. the measures toyota has taken through this campaign are not sufficient. there are countless other owners whose frames only received the crc coating and have continued to rust. this was clearly a stopgap measure. toyota should be held accountable for the safety hazard and economic impact of their design flaw.

The vehicle frame is showing major signs of rust. this apparently is a very common issue. when i contacted toyota regarding this matter i was told that they issued a temporary service for this but i was never notified. this is a huge issue since whenever conponents need replacing the bolts must be cut off due to rusting. this is a safety issue as well since certain areas are thinning on the frame.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact did not receive a notification of the limited service campaign letter advising of a frame inspection. the manufacturer was notified; however, the limited service campaign ended last year and there was no reimbursement for taking the vehicle to a dealer to have the frame inspected. the contact had not experienced a failure.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact received notification of an unknown voluntary recall for corrosion. the vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the subframe was corroded and needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure and stated that the recall was expired. the failure mileage was 33,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact took the vehicle to boch toyota (277 providence hwy, norwood, ma 02062) where the technician informed the contact of frame corrosion. the dealer temporarily repaired the frame. the contact also took the vehicle to wellesley toyota (234 worcestor st, wellesley, ma 02481) where the technician confirmed that the vehicle was not operable due to frame corrosion. the manufacturer was not contacted. the failure mileage was 151,097.

A 1992 ford f-250 (2 door) towing a portable cement mixer, estimated weight @350-450 pounds, crossed the center line and struck a 2006 toyota tundra crew cab (4 door) head on. both vehicles estimated speed was 50 mph. all drivers and passenger were wearing seat belts, airbags did deploy. the f-250's driver sustained 1 detached rib plus cuts and bruises. in the toyota, the following injuries occurred: passenger: broken left ankle, 7 broken ribs, sternum and clavicle fractures, 7 inch leg laceration, 5 inch hand laceration, cuts & bruises. driver: broken right ankle, brain contusion/concussion (visible impact spot on windshield - see below), broken rib, cuts and bruises. toyota's occupants confirmed that the engine/transmission intruded about 2 feet into the passenger compartment, consistent with the ankle injuries. it also appears from photos that the windshield was pushed back into the driver, although the belt and airbag could have not provided adequate protection also. frontal photos of the toyota show, apparently, that the bodywork detached from the frame - the front of the frame is clearly visible & does not look seriously damaged, with the bodywork (including the bumper) pushed back substantially. it seems to me there are several possible defect/design issues here: 1. engine and transmission came straight back and did not deflect downwards, causing the lower extremity injuries. 2. multiple rib injuries despite occupants being belted suggests excessive airbag inflation pressure. 3. body to frame attachment failure, exacerbating intrusion of engine and frontal collapse/compression. the accident was investigated by the california highway patrol (report available) and occurred on state route 178 on may 27, 2015, about 25 miles east of bakersfield, california.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was parked, it was discovered that there was excessive rust on the rear of the vehicle. the vehicle was taken to a dealer but was not diagnosed or repaired. the failure mileage was 125,000.

I recently purchased a 2006 toyota tundra from a toyota dealership in feb 2015. while doing some routine maintenance in may 2015 to the vehicle i noticed some frame rust. when i took a closer look i noticed that some areas of the frame rails where pieces were connected appeared to be starting to separate due to rusting. i contacted a local toyota dealership and took it in on june 20, 2015 for them to have a look. after one of the techs on site looked at the truck frame he told his manager that if this truck came into their shop they would have replaced the frame as part of a recall. the manager took some pictures and said that he would get back to me. after not hearing back for a couple weeks i called the dealership and the manager told me that since the frame was previously coated with a protective coating as part of a toyota recall for rusting frames that there was not much more they could do. i then opened a case with toyota customer care due to my concern of safety and questions about the decision that was made to take no further action on this vehicle even though the recall was still and active campaign. toyota basically gave me the same response as the dealership. i asked if they could at least review the truck to make sure it was safe for driving and they told me that the truck was recalled and the frame was coated with a protective coating and that was basically the end of what they could offer. my concern is that the frame is obviously still rusting so whatever fix they performed did not work. whether it was done improperly or perhaps not the correct decision based on the condition of the frame toyota should have at least gave this case a second evaluation considering that the campaign was still active when i had it at the dealership. i have serious concerns about the safety of driving this truck considering that the frame continues to rust.

I was leaving a parking lot when the right front ball joint failed. the wheel fell off, the suspension dropped down. i put the vehicle in park, turned off the engine and called for a tow truck.

The frame is rotting away, dealer sprayed it about three years ago, almost all of that coating has fallen off.

The 2006 toyota tundra had a recall on the frame because the frames were compromised due to excessive rust. i took my vehicle in to orleans toyota and had the frame inspected. they said the frame was not rusted that bad and it could be treated, which was part of the class action law suit compromise. now my frame has rusted through and the vehicle is not safe to drive. how did the dealership properly inspect a enclosed box frame? how do you treat a frame made out of inferior metal and correct the issue? the treatment did not correct the issue. my vehicle has become a safety issue even after the recall. i live in new england and know this is a very common problem with the toyota tundras at this time. i took my vehicle back in to orleans toyota and had them inspect the frame. they took a picture of where the frame has rusted through and sent it to toyota. toyota has not responded in the last couple months. many of the vehicles that had the frames treated are,or are becoming unsafe to drive.

The truck bed is showing rust spots which apparently is an issue with tundras. talked to the dealer and toyota and they told me it is not under warranty and there is nothing they will do. *tr

I had my vehicle serviced at a local toyota dealership to address the frame rust corrosion recall. corporate guidelines indicate the necessity to inspect, remove the pickup bed, remove any rust and reinspect for rust perforation. corporate allows 8-9 billable hours to the dealership for this service. my vehicles service was completed in less than 4. upon inspection, it is apparent that the dealership never removed the bed nor removed any rust prior to spraying the frame with its "crc". i had documented photographs to prove this point and then contacted toyota corporate. by toyota corporate's request, i returned to the dealership to have the vehicle inspected. upon inspection,the dealership's shop manager acknowledged that the bed was not removed and multiple areas of rust that had been left untouched. only further indicating that in addition to not removing the bed, the dealership did not bother to remove any existing rust from the frame either. the dealership refused to strip and properly treat the frame as indicated by corporate guidelines. i contacted corporate and they are refusing to take any additional actions. as it stands, it is questionable at best as to how long it will be before there is a potential failure here. this is no isolated incident either, there are many owners who are being defrauded in a similar fashion. five minutes on google will easily prove this point. as far as i understand, toyota settled with the frame manufacturer (dana corp) for around $25 million. so toyota sought out and gained financial reimbursement on their end but when it come to taking care of those who have been damaged, not so much. i strongly encourage anyone from the nhtsa to contact me for additional details regarding the matter. i have multiple photographs documenting the issue and the failed attempt at covering it up. *tr

Tamara recall - i was exiting the freeway, making a left hand turn onto the city street, i was traveling approximately 25 miles per hour. as i entered the intersection, on a green light, a 1996 gmc yukon ran a red light, travelling approximately 40 miles an hour and hit me on my front end, damaging the bumper, fender, door, hood and bed on the drivers side. i was wearing my seatbelt but the impact was hard enough to propell me upwards, causing my left shoulder to hit the frame above the window which caused a grade 3 separation of my left collarbone.

I received a letter from toyota telling me i needed to have my frame inspected at the dealership in 2014. i did this and the dealership said my frame was fine. less than 2 years later my mechanic informed me that my frame was not fine and urged me to contact the dealer or toyota corporate directly. i did so but they said that the recall that had been placed on the frames had expired. i recently had some brake work done on the truck after my brake lines burst. the same mechanic informed me that the frame was so bad that he did not think it would pass inspection. i once again contacted toyota directly and they said their was nothing they could do. my truck is currently having the frame analyzed by a third party in hopes repairs can be made so that i do not have to buy a new truck. the truck has 112000 and i intended to put many more miles on it than that. also related to the metal used under that truck, in 2014 the rear pumpkin rusted all the way through and i needed to have a new rear suspension put in. furthermore, i took advantage of ziebart undercoating that the dealer was advertising where for the first 6 years i owned the truck, 2008-2014, i had it undercoated once every year. the fact that it had been protected with the undercoating the first 6 years i had it and then 2 years later was rusted through is an indication to me that their is some sort of manufactures defect. *js

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. after the vehicle was repaired according to an unknown recall, the running boards on both the driver and passenger sides fractured. the contact mentioned that the failure was due to excessive weight being placed on the running boards. the dealer refused to repair the vehicle and would not claim any responsibility. the manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. the failure mileage was 70,000. updated 10/8/14*cn

i brought the above vehicle to superior toyota of erie, pa this morning for the recall for excessive frame rust, same refused to give me a loaner car without me giving them a credit card, i informed the clerk that i am not renting a car from you - you are providing me a loaner for my trouble with your vehicle. i then left the dealership. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the rear frame of the vehicle was corroded. the vehicle was serviced under an unknown recall; however, the remedy failed. the contact mentioned that the sprayed remedy came off and showed that the rear frame and hitch assembling were becoming more corroded. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 235,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact noticed a sticky substance on the dashboard near the air bag on the passenger side of the vehicle. the contact also stated that the top coat was melting and exhibited a shine, which caused a glare. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated that this issue occurred to all vehicles. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 67,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact received a voluntary recall regarding the subframe corrosion. the vehicle was taken to the dealer. the technician sprayed a coating to prevent the subframe from rusting more; however, the remedy failed to repair the vehicle. the contact stated that the coating was separating from the vehicle. the vehicle was taken back to the dealer multiple times. the technician informed the contact that they would not provide further assistance and stated that the frame would continue to rust. the manufacturer was notified. the voluntary recall number was unknown. the failure mileage was 70,000.

(toyota going places) on wednesdays february 5, 2014 about 5:30pm , i was driving my 2006 toyota tundra to work. as i was making a right-hand turn onto i-95 south, the front left-hand side of my truck collapsed. to my surprise the ball joints head separated from the suspension, the left bottom front suspension was dragging the highway and the left front wheel was now stuck under the running board. this accident also damaged the left front bumper, the left front fender and the left front door. needless to say i was traumatized. i saw no warning that this accident was about to happen. i kept my truck in immaculate condition and had regularly maintenance done at this toyota dealership. we decided to do a search on the web to see if any recalls existed and there is a recall on the 2006 toyota tundra for this exact issue. however when i called toyota corporate and provided my vin number - low and behold my truck was not in that recall (my vin# missed it by 15 days). the toyota representative asked me to take my truck to the local toyota dealership and get a written estimate. at my own expense, i had the truck towed and after about two days my repair expenses were denied by toyota. however, i was offered $750 toward the purchase of a new toyota for being a loyal customer. i purchased three new vehicles from this toyota dealership (2006, 2007, & 2008). after fighting with the dealership and toyota corporate for a day and half, i was asked to move my truck out of their shop. so at my expense my 2006 tundra was towed back to my house (toyota going places). without exaggeration, a lot of people are going to get hurt if fatalities do not occur due to this defect. toyota need another recall. toyota going places - if the ball joints don't fall out sincerely yours, 06 toyota tundra owner *tr

2006 toyota tundra. consumer stated the vehicle incurred frame rusting. *ss the consumer stated the vehicle was recall for frame rusting. the local toyota dealer performed the treatment last february. however, an inspection performed by an independent mechanic discovered that only part of the frame had been treated and there was serious flaking/erosion of an untreated portion of the frame. *jb

My 2006 toyota tundra is experiencing extreme corrosion of the rear axle assembly and skid pans. i've had a mechanic inspect the damage and he concurred that the rust is far worse than would be expected for a vehicle of this age. the metal is pitted and flakes of rust are falling off of the rear axle housing. i contacted a local toyota dealership to have it inspected but they would not even look at the vehicle because it is no longer under warranty. failure of the rear axle housing poses a considerable safety risk. i purchased the vehicle with 40,000 miles on it and i live in an area where salts are used liberally during the winter. i've gone to great lengths to wash salts off my truck as soon as possible, yet the rust continues. *tr

Toyota recalled for frame rust. vehicle taken apart and frame replaced. vibration present between 30 and 70mph. vibration gets extreme when not under load (ie slowing down). has been back at dealer 6 times to try to identify/repair. no resolution. toyota customer experience department recommended i take recourse. contacted state attorney general who is trying to mediate a resolution. ag office recommended i file a complaint with nhtsa as well. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that a manufacturer service campaign was completed in which the remedy was to coat the frame with a solution. the frame had prematurely rusted. the bumper was also replaced due to premature rust and corrosion. the manufacturer indicated that there was no recall campaign to address the repair the vine was invalid. the approximate failure mileage was 157,000. updated 04/12/17 lj *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that a manufacturer service campaign was completed in which the remedy was to coat the frame with a solution. the frame had prematurely rusted. the bumper was also replaced due to premature rust and corrosion. the manufacturer indicated that there was no recall campaign to address the repair. the approximate failure mileage was 28,000. updated 04/11/17 lj *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact noticed corrosion on the subframe of the vehicle. the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 130,000.

The frame and suspension components have an abundance of rust on them. flakes of metal are dropping/pealing off and the rust has spread to all parts of the frame and is prevalent around welds on the suspension parts. this concerns me due to the welds being the main component that bonds together the suspension pieces. the frame is showing an unusual amount of rust for such a young vehicle and poses a safety risk to me. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the passenger side dashboard was sticky and discolored. the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the failure mileage was 95,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. the contact stated that the vehicle was recalled regarding the chassis. the repair consisted of spraying a substance that would prevent rust from occurring. the vehicle received the recall repair. after the vehicle was inspected by a certified mechanic, the contact was informed that the frame was severely rusted. the certified mechanic diagnosed that the chassis was damaged to the point of no return. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. due to the fact that the vehicle had already received the recall repair, the manufacturer was not obligated to provide another repair. the vin and recall details were unknown. the approximate failure mileage was 82,000. updated 10/18/17*lj *tr

Frame is rusting nearly on half, at front suspension. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2006 toyota tundra. while the vehicle was parked, the contact noticed that there was water on the floorboard of the front passenger side of the vehicle. the failure recurred on numerous occasions. the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 20,000. updated 09/21/15*lj updated 12/13/2017*cn

In december 2009 while driving our 2006 toyota tundra, my wife and i began to feel a strange motion coming from the rear end of the truck; whenever we came to a full stop, it felt as if we someone hit us in the rear of our vehicle. december 18, 2009 i took the vehicle the toyota dealer, i was told this is a problem with some toyota vehicles and they adjusted center support bearing, replaced trans mount and cross member. after picking up my vehicle on january 8, 2010 the problem still existed, i took my vehicle back to the dealer on january 12, 2010 for repairs. the dealer contacted technical support and on february 1, 2010, again, i was told there was nothing else that could be done to my vehicle; this is something that happens to some vehicles. the is yet to be corrected. *tr

2006 toyota tundra sr5 v8 4x4 showing early signs of excessive rust on the under side of the vehicle. the welds are showing excessive rust, as is the rear differential and axle. the truck only has 39,000 miles on it and i emailed photos to 3 friends who are mechanics and much more knowledgeable than i am. *tr

My 2006 toyota tundra has frame rust issues. truck is less than 3 years old. took delivery of brand new truck on january 27, 2007. now where my truck is parked in the drive way there are major rust stains on the driveway. again, truck is driven in northern kentucky area, is less than 3 years old, has less than 40,000 miles and is showing signs of rust on frame that are so bad that it is staining the driveway. notified toyota today, and will get the truck inspected by a toyota dealership in the area soon. *tr

2006 toyota tundra sr-5 46k miles todate. rain, everytime precipitation is experienced, vehicle has not been repaired. rain leaks into passenger compartment around windshield. complaints all over the internet for tundra's tacoma's and rav4's. my problem began aprox 7/09 40,k miles. windows fog, instruments possibly rusting, and other electrical components in passenger console/compartment subjected to h-2-0. potential rust and mildew problem on floor and carpet respectively. *tr

06 tundra seen very little mud, mud never sat on for over 24 hrs. only 21k miles on it n rusting greatly... *tr

2006 toyota tundra front end rusting out. 20,000. miles on it. no salting on roads during winter in our area. *tr