Problems with 2001 Toyota Tacoma STRUCTURE

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the center framing corroded and detached. the vehicle was taken to the dealer, but was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 350,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the sub frame was severely corroded. the manufacturer was contacted and denied servicing the vehicle under nhtsa campaign id number: 12v542000 (tires) due to the corrosion. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and current mileage was 98,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that while the vehicle was having routine maintenance performed, the technician noticed that the frame was rusted and corroded. the manufacturer was notified who recommended that the vehicle not be driven. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 71,000.

The frame was rusted, and we were aware of recalls. 2 weeks ago we had it inspected at the dealer where we bought it. the mechanic told us the vehicle was un-driveable. the service department sent the information to toyota but the recall claim was denied. the mechanic gave us a number to call to place a claim. the representative told us we had been mailed a letter in 2011 saying the vehicle needed undercoating. she admitted that it was something toyota was doing legally to avoid having to honor the recall claim. she also said that the undercoating would have been useless since defective steel was used to construct the frame. again, the case manager told us the claim was being denied. *tr

I purchased the best truck i could ever wish for, 2001 toyota tacoma; it's an xtra cab with trd with the sr5. today at 113500 miles it still looks and runs showroom new. but it has the rust on the frame and bad too. toyota refuses to help in any way. in 2012 the frame was perfect, now it is almost eaten through. i love this truck but it is unsafe to drive and i am very displeased with how they are handling the situation. at 113500 miles i opt to go with toyota compared to chevrolet because toyota had a wonderful reputation on reliable vehicles and i was sold on that. when the recall was sent out, i was living in virginia and battling cancer so i missed the recall. i believe toyota should warrant their product or close down their plants if they won?t honor the issues at hand. i want a new frame or at least another truck with my engine and transmission, my baby is gorgeous. i am now on a fixed income with blood clots in my lungs due to the cancer i need my truck. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that while the vehicle was being serviced by an independent mechanic, the contact was informed that the frame of the vehicle was rusted and the vehicle was unsafe to drive. the vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was confirmed that the bottom of the frame was completely rusted and needed to be replaced. the manufacturer was contacted about the failure and stated that the vehicle was not included in any recalls. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure and current mileage was 159,000. updated 2/25/13 *cn the consumer stated the manufacturer refused to offer assistance due to the recall being closed on dec 31, 2011. the manufacturer stated the consumer should have recieved a notice. the consumer changed addresses since purchasing the vehicle, therefore did not recieve any notice. the manufacturer denied any assistance. updated 03/11/2013 *js

In 2012, i drove my toyota tacoma pickup truck to a local dealer in response to a recall letter. i was responding to a notice that toyota had mailed to me. the recall was for a spare tire carrier that may fall off the frame at highway speeds because of a known corrosion problem. the dealership told me that they could not perform the repair because the vehicle's frame was too badly corroded. the dealership performed a frame inspection, & they told me my vehicle had "failed". the dealership did nothing, except to contact toyota corp. representatives from toyota have telephoned me twice to say that they will do nothing. the company representatives said that my truck "did not meet the parameters of their program". since then, i have received three more notices from toyota concerning the faulty spare tire plate. each time i bring my pickup truck in response to these recall notices, i'm turned away. after doing some research, i discovered how toyota had bought back vehicles like mine because of the faulty steel used to make the frame. my wife and i are both elderly. she has three forms of cancer, and we depend in this vehicle. when my wife and i purchased the tacoma new in 2001, we also purchased a $2,200 extra protection package. we had hoped that toyota would stand behind their product should anything go wrong. they refused. the frame of my vehicle is buckling. it shakes and groans when moving along the road. the dealership & toyota both informed us that our truck is unsafe, & then walked away without offering a remedy. we feel we've been trapped by unjust business practices. for the past three years, everyone involved has refused to help us. now that the nhtsa is involved, will you help us? [xxx] [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).' *jb*jb

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the chassis, the spare tire cable and the holder became corroded. the vehicle was taken to the dealer where the manufacturer advised that the vehicle was not included in nhtsa campaign number: 12v542000 (tires). the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 94,000 and the current mileage 95,200. kmj updated 7/29/13 *cn

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that while at an independent mechanic for unrelated repair the contact was informed the frame was severally corroded. the vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. the technician stated there was a manufacturer recall that was issued the previous year to treat the frame and prevent corrosion. the contact did not receive notification of the recall and never had the vehicle treated. the technician stated there was no repair for the failure and informed the contact they were not liable for the frame corrosion. the mechanic advised the vehicle should not be driven because it was unsafe. the vehicle was not repaired. the vin was not available. the approximate failure mileage was 230,000. updated 01/14/13

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that when the vehicle was taken for an inspection, the mechanic noticed that the entire frame was rusted. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 72,000.

2001 toyota tacoma. consumer writes in regards to issues with the vehicle frame. *smd the consumer stated he only took possession of the vehicle six months ago, and was unaware of the problem with the frame and would like to get the issue resolved. *jb

I live in virginia. there was a safety recall for inspection of the truck frame for rust corrosion. at the time vehicle had the recall i was being treated for a mental disability and in mental hospitals. i was not of sound mind or judgment to understand the "recall notice". while having oil changed by the toyota dealer the frame of the truck was noted to have holes in the frame caused by rust. toyota motor corporation has refused to replace the frame of the truck honoring the recall even though i provided the necessary information from doctors providing documentation of my illness at the time of the recall. on march 14, 2013, the vehicle was taken in for a safety recall for rust of the spare tire carrier; which could fall off causing an accident. the toyota dealer replaced the spare tire carrier consisting of two metal plates with four bolts that was bolted to a defective frame that has holes due to corrosion; also, they replaced supports that runs between the two frame rails; they did not replace the cable nor the rusted part that holds the wheel to the previous assembly parts. this has not fixed the issue because they have only replaced the spare tire carrier plate onto a frame that has holes due to rust that is not safe to drive. i need this vehicle as i am on disability and limited income; i want the frame replaced or a new truck with the same options as i have on the 2001 tacoma. toyota received a 25 million dollar settlement from dana corporation, supplier of the tacoma truck frames, proper antirust preventative was not applied to prevent corrosion, which was a cost saving for one or both companies. from 1995 to 2004 the tacoma trucks have had this problem. by replacing the frame toyota would not be losing any money because they got their money from dana corp supplier of the tacoma frames. *tr

I brake in my driveway at approx. 2 mph, heard a loud thump in the rear end of my 2001 tacoma. when i checked, i found that the driver side front bracket to leaf spring holding the rear axle was actually sitting 2 or 3 inches into the frame rail. the frame had rusted through in that spot, the rust was so bad, that 6 inches of steel on bottom of frame rail was gone in any direction of the leaf spring bracket attachment point. there isn't enough steel left to even attempt a weld to repair it. on close inspection of the frame overall, there are multiple points where the frame rails have disintegrated. my rear axle is sitting off-center, and the car cannot be driven. if normal force or torque is applied, the axle will break free, and this will cause an accident. i heard that there is a recall on tacoma frame rails, so i called the dealer. dealer stated my vin did not have a recall; i called toyota, they told me that i would be contacted in 1 business day. they never called. 2 days later, i called and got transferred to their "truck team," got shuffled around for 6 more phone calls over 3 days, when they informed me that they mailed me a notice that i had to have gotten a frame spraying to qualify for the frame recall. i never received such notice, and toyota did not even have my address; which they stated that they got all information from dmv. my dmv info is current, always has been. toyota has given my every type of run-around imaginable, ultimately denying my recall. on websites, there are thousands of people in my same situation...exactly the same. further, there are many people who had the frame spray, which then peeled off within months of application. this seems like toyota deliberately tried to exclude as many people as possible with this frame spray, which wouldn't be necessary in the first place if the frames weren't defective. my truck is dead. *tr

Toyota tacoma 2001 in great shape other than the frame is rusting out. took it to my mechanic for routine maintenance oil change; he saw some heavy corrosion on the frame. in several places, it has eaten through and has perforations. he says it is getting to be unsafe. i just bought this truck about a year ago at a dealership in ohio and was not made aware that this was a huge problem in the 1996-2003 models, but this issue is apparently very common as toyota did not provide acceptable undercoatings for these models. next step is to take it to the toyota dealership and see what they say. at this point, i would take a buyout but would prefer to have the frame/chassis replaced at their expense. i love this truck and use it everyday. very scared to drive it right now and hope they come through to fix their mistake. this should be a public recall since it is a huge safety concern and people should be made aware that this is a time-bomb accident waiting to happen. these trucks are everywhere on the road. thanks *tr

My frame was replaced under recall because of the rust. a couple weeks after getting my truck back i was stranded in 100 degree heat because i was unable to get my spare tire out from under bed of truck. severely rusted bumper no longer allows access to mechanism to lower tire. fought with dealer and regional mgr. they say it is not a safety issue. i could not disagree more. why then do we have spare. he did admit that if it was his wife and children stranded on the highway it might be different. but, no..... now they are recalling the part that hold the spare under the truck because tire may fall off. that would be doing me a favor.... *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. while the vehicle was at the dealer being repaired for nhtsa campaign number: 12v542000 (tires), the technician stated that the frame for the under carriage of the vehicle was rusted. the technician stated that the vehicle was unable to be repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 75,000. updated 08/02/16*lj consumer wrote letters about recalls, received another recall for the same excessive corrosion to the spare tire carrier lift plate consumer noted recall should of been sent out for rusted frame as well. 04/17/18 *jb *tr

We received a recall notice on the vehicle for the frame rusting to quickly. the company's recall notice stated we could take it to the local dealership for the frame to be sprayed with an undercoat. when we took it to a dealership, we were told we had "missed the window of opportunity to have it spray coated." we missed it by one week. two dealerships were not willing to spray the frame of the vehicle. when we received the recall notice, there was no notification we had until a certain date to get this done. many people lead busy lives, working. we missed it by one week. i have written to the toyota co. in ma. and i haven't heard back at all. now i have a vehicle i can not drive, inspect, or register, due to the poor quality when it was manufactured. now the co. isn't willing to stand behind its product. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the frame was cracked. the vehicle was inspected by an independent mechanic, who stated that the frame was cracked on both sides near the shackles. the frame was welded but the problem recurred. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the incident. the approximate failure mileage was 120,000.

I just purchased this truck for my sons first vehicle. 1 day after i purchased it, i was informed of a recall issue toyota had with these frames rusting excessively creating a safety issue while driving. i took to my toyota dealer they confirmed and inspected my truck. they told me it was unsafe to drive. i called toyota customer care they told me my vehicle was not covered and there was nothing they would do. i can't believe they won't cover this failure. if they are only building vehicles to last 11 years, they should be shut down. now my son has a truck he can't drive! great first car huh? i think it's toyota doesn't care center. any help would be appreciated. *jb

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for an inspection and they detected that the rear frame was damaged due to rust and corrosion. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer issued a voluntary recall pertaining to the frame and the vin was not included. the manufacturer was notified of the defect. the approximate failure mileage was 100,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma pickup truck. the contact stated the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for inspection and they advised him there was a hole in the frame. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was not notified of the defect. the approximate failure mileage was 95,000. updated 08/20/13*lj

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that upon inspection, it was noticed that the entire frame had corroded due to rust. the manufacturer previously issued a voluntary recall related to the structure but the recall expired. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who welded the area which exhibited a hole as a temporary fix. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 134,000. the vin was unavailable.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact inspected the vehicle and noticed that the frame was rotten. the vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnosis, where the dealer advised that they would have to replace the frame of the vehicle. the manufacturer was contacted and provided no assistance. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 80,000 and the current mileage was 90,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that while driving, the rear of the vehicle began to swerve from side to side. the vehicle was taken to the dealer where the dealer inspected the vehicle and found that the rear frame and wheel were severely corroded. the dealer advised the contact that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the failure and the current mileage was 144,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. while at an independent mechanic for unrelated repairs, the contact was advised by the mechanic that the the frame was corroded. the mechanic also stated the entire frame would have to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 110,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the vehicle was being examined by an authorized dealer when he was informed that there was a hole rusted through the frame. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and offered no assistance. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 113,000.

I frequently check the stability of the spare tire that is stored on the underside exterior of the bed. recently i noticed that the tire was loose and moving back and forth. this prompted me to lower the tire by using the provided crank handle. after it was lowered to the ground i was shocked to see that the retaining bracket and cable spring were severely rusted. i felt that this could pose a potential safety hazard to me while operating the vehicle on the highway if that bracket fails. it could possibly cause the vehicle to roll over and the tire to fly off and cause danger to other motorists. i promptly removed the spare tire from the vehicle and went to my local toyota dealer. they seemed to look past the safety hazard it poses and were more interested in charging me ore $600.00 to install a new retaining bracket. i inquired to the service consultant as to why this problem was not brought addressed to me when my truck was in there a few months earlier for the frame rust perforation recall. he replied that if they notice any issues they present the customer with a list of recommendations. at that time they had the entire cab and chassis off to install a brand new frame. i can't imagine how something as crucial as this potential deadly problem could go undetected. i recently spoke with 2 individuals who had personal experiences pertaining to this issue. one witnessed a deadly rollover due to this problem and the other had his spare fall off and roll down the road. i feel this issue should be presented to the proper officials and action should be taken soon. i hope to hear from you regarding this serious issue. thank you. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the vehicle was parked when she noticed that the undercarriage frame was severely corroded. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer where the contact was informed that the entire frame needed to be replaced. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed of an expired voluntary campaign they issued that addressed the failure. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was 144,233. updated 08/31/2011 *ln

The frame of my 2001 toyota tacoma was replaced in 2010 because of severe rust problems. the rear axle assembly has the same rust problem , the axle is leaking. should toyota have replaced the rear axle also. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that the frame had extensive rust and corrosion to the point that it could fracture. in addition, battlefield toyota (11013 james monroe hwy, culpeper, va 22701, (540) 317-7800) was notified and a shock absorber was ordered because it was also rusted. the part was replaced. the frame rust and corrosion was not repaired. the manufacturer was contacted to verify if the dealer placed a coating on the vehicle years ago due to an unknown recall regarding the structure, but failed to replace the frame. the manufacturer was notified. the vin and failure mileage were not available.

This is about my 2001 toyota tacoma in massachusetts on june 6 2008 went in for frame inspection report from dealer no rot condition is excellent brought it in today november 23, 2010. total rot replacing the frame, up to 3 month wait for frame. *tr

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. while the vehicle was at the dealer to have a corrosion resistance product applied to the frame, the technicians stated the frame was rusted. the manufacturer had a voluntary recall which extended the warranty for the vehicle to be inspected yearly for corrosion. the dealer stated the frame would have to be replaced. the manufacturer was contacted and stated the frame would be replaced free of charge but if there were other parts that may be damaged due to the corrosion that the contact would have to cover the costs. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 109,000.

The 2001 toyota tacoma truck i owned was recalled for rusting frame. at the time i received the recall notice the frame on my truck was almost 90% rusted. on may 7, 2010 i took it to fox lake toyota dealership for the said recall and application for a corrosion preventative compound was performed by the dealer service department. on early october of this year i notice that large amount of the applied compound are peeling. i took it back to the same dealership on october 20 for inspection related to the peeling issue. the dealership called back october 22 informing me that they can't do anything since almost all of the compound are now gone. the service personnel claim that upon speaking to toyota, it was noted that they are researching it. i was told to take my vehicle back. i have the vehicle with me now but i am afraid to drive not knowing if the frame has rusted throughout. i inquired to the service personnel if the vehicle is safe to drive but did not get a straight answer. with winter approaching the vehicle will be again subjected to the corrosive environment. to date i have not receive a call back from the dealership or toyota as to what action they need to perform. no claim number was also provided by the dealership for me to use in case i call toyota directly. *tr

I own a 2001 toyota tacoma doublecab that i purchased used in 2008. i recently received a letter from toyota stating that i should make an appointment to have the frame checked out for corrosion and rust. i did and it failed inspection. it was perforated on both sides of the frame and had excessive rust. toyota offered to replace the frame rather than buy the truck back. i do not feel safe in this vehicle anymore. the rear bumper is rotted through, the frame , and by doing research i've found several recalls that i was unaware of. they want to break down the truck to the frame and replace and rebuild it with the same old parts in a dealership, not a manufacturing plant. i was told that toyota does not buy back 2001 tacomas and refuses to negotiate to get this vehicle off the road. this vehicle was not rebuilt when i bought it and think that it is very unfair that i only have one option. this vehicle is unsafe and i will no longer drive it even if they replace the frame. the consumer should have an option to have the vehicle bought back for what it is worth at least. *tr

While driving on rt 24 north of nashville, the hood on our 2001 toyota tacoma flew completely open. the result was a smashed front windshield, a dented cab roof and a severely bent hood. the vehicle was able to be pulled over without anyone being hurt or killed. we replaced the windshield and tied down the hood. *tr

The frame my 2001 toyota tacoma was built on is rotting and has a whole in it. toyota wants to replace the frame, but the cost exceeds the value of truck. i do not think this is legal. the first customer service rep i spoke to said "she would not feel safe in a truck in similar circumstances". *tr

My 2001 toyota tacoma has a perforated frame. i was issued a letter from toyota explaining the options. one option was to replace my frame. the other option was for toyota to buy back my vehicle at 1.5 % of excellent kelly blue book. i was not given the buy back option and they are trying to force the frame replacement on me. i am not happy with the remedy they have selected for me. this vehicle may never be the same after the frame is replaced. this is not any easy fix . to many parts are involved and i was informed it will take about 2 months to complete these repairs. *tr

Toyota refused to fix dangerous rust defect on 2001 tacoma, which caused a rear differential gear oil leak. *tr

2001 toyota tacoma-pass nj state inspection. a friend looked and said your frame is rusted. took it to my local toyota saturday 4/17/10 and they said the truck was unsafe to drive. they will have to replace the frame. i said i needed a truck for a rental they said by monday or tuesday they should have one. it is thursday 4/22/10 and can not get in touch with anyone... i need a truck that is how i put food on my table.. called corporate and they are giving me the run around too... my other concern is after they remove everything and put it back together other things are going to break. also, the resale value of my truck has decreased... *tr

I took my toyota tacoma pick up to signature toyota in benton harbor, michigan for a frame recall and the dealer informed me that it was not recalled and i had letter in hand that said it was. now in december 14, 2014 i took it back to the same dealer for the spare tire recall and they said that it could not be fixed because i did not have the frame recall fixed and i told them that i had it in there and they told me it was not part of the recall. and they would not fix it and toyota will not fix it earthier. they are telling me that the truck is not safe to drive. i took the truck to jorden toyota for a second opinion. i thought that signature was telling me the truth when in fact they weren't. *tr

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. she took the vehicle into the dealer to inspect the frame, which she had observed was slightly rusted. the dealer stated that the vehicle was thoroughly rusted and would not allow her to drive the vehicle off of the lot. the entire frame was replaced under the manufacturer's warranty enhancement for frame rust perforation on model trucks in severe cold climate areas with high road salt use (nhtsa item number : 10027968: service bulletin number : tcs-08-018). after the repairs were made to the vehicle, she noticed black smoke coming from the exhaust, the vehicle was using more gas than before and she could literally watch the fuel gauge moving closer to empty as she proceeded. the vehicle would not idle properly and was exhibiting a "bucking" gesture as if it was not getting enough fuel. while inspecting the vehicle, a personal mechanic noticed that the 02 sensor was hanging from the vehicle and caused the vehicle to exhibit the failures. the vehicle was taken back to the dealer where they stated the sensor was in the same place as when she first brought the vehicle. no further repairs were made to the vehicle. the failure and current mileages were approximately 126,000. updated 4/30/10 *cn the o2 sensor needed to be replaced. updated 07/15/10.*jb

Rusty leaky diff problem the oil leaks constantly. i called the toyota dealer and they said there is no recall and nothing they will do about it at this time. *tr

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the frame on the vehicle has corrosion and there was a hole in the frame on the driver side near the fuel tank. the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for inspection. the technician stated the main frame was severely damaged, but no repairs were made. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the vehicle identification number was unavailable. the failure and current mileages were 109,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. she noticed corrosion on the frame of her vehicle. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, who advised her to contact both nhtsa and the manufacturer in reference to a safety concern. the manufacturer had not yet returned her call. no repairs were made. the current and failure mileages were under 70,000.

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. the contact stated that while replacing a flat tire, severe rust was noticed on the frame. the entire frame had perforations due to corot ion. the contact also stated that the vehicle was taken to the dealer in 2009 for an evaluation of the frame and was advised that there was nothing wrong and the corrosion resistant treatment was not needed. in july 2016, the vehicle was taken to the local dealer and the diagnosis was that the vehicle had missed the warranty repair in 2012. the manufacturer was notified of the failure. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 160,000.

2001 toyota tacoma frame structure is falling apart before its time. even if they install a new frame it will cost to much money to replace parts to other components not under warranty. the truck would loose its value if the frame has to be replaced. why are we letting toyota get away with this? *tr

Perforated frame. *tr

The frame on my 2001 toyota tacoma is rusted through in several places. toyota has offered to replace the frame for free, but is offering owners of 1995 - 2000 tacomas to buy their trucks from them for 1.5 x the kelley blue book value, at the "excellent condition" rate regardless of the vehicle's condition. so the owners of the older trucks reap a cash benefit of over 50% of the truck's value, while we owners of 01-04 tacomas end up driving rebuilt vehicles. a toyota rep told me that they're buying the older ones back because they can no longer get replacement frames for them. if that's the case, in a couple of years, owners of trucks like mine will be getting the 150% buyback and the rest of us will be driving our original (rebuilt) trucks with the replacement frames. my local toyota dealer inspected my frame yesterday, told me it failed, and sent me on my way. the vehicle can't be safe - it won't pass the state inspection with holes in the frame. i drive about 12,000 miles a year. the truck has 134,000 miles on it. unless they're building the replacement frames differently, it's possible that the new frame will rot out before the truck wears out otherwise. for a company whose reputation is built on reliability, you'd think they'd want to treat all the owners of the defective vehicles the same. *tr

My 2001 toyota tacoma has dealer verified frame rust perforation. when the first letter from toyota came to my door in early 2009 i went directly to my local dealer who did not know anything about this issue and stated to me that they would get back to me with more information as it became available to them. several months later, i was told by the dealer that wisconsin was asking toyota to provide more data on the propose solutions to this issue and had not approved toyota to make any repairs. i was also told that they would contact me when i could get my truck inspected. many more months passed and finally i had enough and called toyota direct. i was assigned a case manager and she said she would help me get my truck inspected. this finally happened on april 27, 2010. now they tell my only option is a replacement frame, which to me is not acceptable. then lucky 2001 owners who were able to get quick inspections were offered the buy back option. in various forums the ones with the replacement frames are seeing issues with leaking gas tanks, and up charges for incidental items. *tr

Just paid top dollar for a 2001 toyota tacoma only to find on the inside of the frame is completely rotted away and is very unsafe with any weight loaded in it. have found numerous accounts of premature frame failure due to faulty materials documented on the internet. new frame would need to be replaced along with new fasteners. *tr